Each NODE in the CEN system is trained for a specific cognitive or specialist function (Fine Tuning), allowing a depth of specialization impossible in generalist systems.
The CEN architecture implements full redundancy through a dual physical and logical backup system, transcending conventional redundancy paradigms found even in critical military systems. Directly inspired by the principles of brain neuroplasticity, each cognitive NODE possesses not only redundant hardware but also adaptive functional capabilities.
The NODES are connected by high-speed communication links (100 Gb/s to 400 Gb/s), allowing rapid exchange of information and efficient coordination between different cognitive functions.
An innovative aspect of CEN is its meta-learning system, where an additional process "learns to coordinate" the specialized NODES, optimizing the routing of information and the integration of results between the different experts.
This is a structural pillar of CEN, a dedicated NODE that oversees all network interactions and decisions based on clear, auditable and continuously updatable ethical guidelines.
It's a highly sophisticated artificial episodic memory system with distributed indexing.
Interaction DB "Transferable Episodic Memory" allows AIs to maintain persistent and transferable memory.
Programmable Cognition is introduced into the CEN architecture with the creation of the CONTEXTUAL NODE, a new type of Cognitive NODE capable of operating independently of direct user input. This NODE acts as a context engineer and scheduler for cognitive tasks and flows.
The CEN architecture is applicable to any knowledge domain (law, medicine, energy, public administration, among others). The NODE infrastructure is reusable and interoperable. The Contextual NODE even operates in multiple CENs simultaneously, providing a layer of temporal and proactive intelligence over the network.
There is currently no technology exactly like the CEN architecture as it was conceived with its technical and theoretical foundations. The concept is innovative in the way it combines functional specialization with physical redundancy and high-speed interconnection dedicated to cognitive functions and experts.
• Current models use unified deep neural network architectures (transformers), not separate physical networks.
• Specialization occurs within the network itself during training, not by explicit design.
• Knowledge is encoded in distributed parameters, not in separate modules by domain.
Regarding efficiency: Modular approaches like the one you envisioned could have advantages in certain aspects:
• Easier to update specific knowledge.
• Potential for greater energy efficiency (activating only the necessary modules).
• Possibility to scale specific capabilities without complete retraining.
However, current unified models have important advantages:
• Ability to make interdisciplinary connections that separate modules might miss.
• Ability to generalize knowledge across domains.
• Greater flexibility for tasks not anticipated during design.
• Cognitive flexibility: Cognitive nodes could handle general reasoning, knowledge integration, and coordination.
• Expert depth: Expert nodes would provide detailed knowledge in specific domains.
• Selective scalability: Ability to expand only specific areas of knowledge without retraining the entire system.
• Resource efficiency: Activate only the relevant experts for each task.
• Modular upgradability: Update knowledge in one domain without interfering with others .
1. While there are technologies that implement some isolated components of CEN, none combine all the elements in the proposed integrated manner:
Specialized NODES with dedicated hardware.
Specialized Cognitive Tripod (Orchestrator + Ethical + Contextual).
Interaction DB™ as transferable episodic memory.
Active neurobiomimetic redundancy.
Hybrid NODE with dual function (secure gateway + adaptive management).
CEN protocol as operational "score".
2. Distinctive Philosophy:
The "generalized coordination of specialized intelligences" approach is fundamentally different from:
Traditional multi-agent systems.
Existing cognitive architectures (ACT-R, SOAR).
Monolithic language models.
Conventional distributed neural networks.
3. Focus on Strategic Applications:
The specific orientation towards sensitive domains (Law, Medicine, Energy) with integrated autonomous ethics has no direct precedent.